Deprecated: bp_before_xprofile_cover_image_settings_parse_args is deprecated since version 6.0.0! Use bp_before_members_cover_image_settings_parse_args instead. in /home/top4art.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5094
  • Wiese Groth posted an update 4 days, 7 hours ago

    The median OS was 12.5 versus 11.8 months in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7.5 versus 7.1 months in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively. The objective response rate was 51% in the ADX group and 41% in the PBO group. Among the subgroup analyses, patients of age ≥ 65 years had an improved OS and PFS with ADX versus PBO; the

    values and CIs were not adjusted for multiplicity. There were no meaningful differences in the safety profile of the ADX versus PBO groups.

    The addition of ADX to mFOLFOX6 did not improve OS in unselected patients with untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

    The addition of ADX to mFOLFOX6 did not improve OS in unselected patients with untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

    We evaluated the validity and intra-, inter-, and test-retest reliability of the Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale (SCUES) sum and item scores in patients with upper motor neuron lesions.

    Thirty-one boys and 15 girls (mean age ± SD 11 years 1 month ± 3 years 9 month) with upper motor neuron lesions participated. We correlated SCUES scores with the range of motion items of the Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) and Box and Block Test (BBT) to establish concurrent validity and compared scores between the more and less affected side for discriminative validity. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and smallest detectable changes (SDC) indicated relative and absolute reliability.

    For the more affected side, SCUES sum scores correlated well with MA2 (

     = 0.83) and BBT (

     = 0.77), and reliability proved high for intra-rater (ICC = 0.93, SDC = 2.55), inter-rater (ICC = 0.86, SDC = 3.58), and test-retest (ICC = 0.98, SDC = 1.41) reliability. Reliability of single items varied from 0.64 (inter-ratalid and reliable in patients with upper motor neuron lesions.Test-retest reliability of the SCUES seems excellent.SCUES single item scores show concurrent validity and acceptable reliability.Limb and item scores are significantly lower for the more affected side.Essential oils in air-spray form are being more and more used for several purposes, even by allergic and asthmatic patients. Available data on the potentially dangerous effects of volatile organic compounds and terpenes contained in essential oils are scarce, and sometimes difficult to compare. Through the present work, we evaluated the clinical tolerance of asthmatic patients exposed to compounds emitted by an essential oils spray, and compared previous and new data available in the scientific literature, focusing on the aspects that may influence clinical results.Limited data are available on physical activity tracking among adults in low- and middle-income countries. Using a longitudinal design, we assessed trends and correlates of physical activity among Sri Lankan adults. Individuals selected through age-stratified random sampling, were screened initially in 2007 (n = 2986) and reevaluated in 2014 (n = 2148). On both occasions, structured interviews and clinical measurements were completed. Approximately 40% of the participants engaged in recommended levels of physical activity both at baseline and follow-up. One-fifth reported increased physical activity at follow-up, a similar proportion reported being persistently inactive or a reduction in physical activity. In the adjusted analysis, being persistently active was associated with male sex, a lower educational level and income, being free of any chronic disease conditions, better self-rated health, and sitting time less then 8 hours. Our findings support public health interventions to help maintain recommended physical activity levels over time, particularly for subgroups at high-risk of physical inactivity.

    The association of the modified STarT Back Tool (mSBT) psychosocial measure with gait speed and knee pain in knee osteoarthritis is not well defined. This study aimed to, in patients with knee osteoarthritis, (i) examine the convergent validity of mSBT with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and (ii) compare the predictive validity of mSBT and HADS with gait speed and knee pain.

    We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of mSBT, HADS, gait speed, and knee pain outcomes data collected from 119 patients who received outpatient physical therapy. Of these patients who were evaluated at their first (baseline) physical therapy visit, 55 had available data at the Week-16 follow-up visit.

    mSBT and HADS showed moderately strong pairwise correlations (Spearman correlation > 0.57;

     < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, body weight, and knee impairment variables in multivariable linear mixed-effects analyses, mSBT was associated with gait speed (

     < 0.001) and knee pain intensity (

     sychological distress in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

    The mSBT had convergent validity with HADS and it showed predictive validity with gait speed and knee pain in knee osteoarthritis. Although broader validation is required, the 5-item mSBT psychosocial measure may be applied as part of routine clinical care to assess psychological distress in patients with knee osteoarthritis. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION The 5-item psychosocial subscale of the modified STarT Back tool (mSBT) showed good convergent validity with the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with knee osteoarthritis. SU11274 datasheet The mSBT psychosocial subscale showed predictive validity, at both cross-sectional and longitudinal levels, with gait speed and knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The mSBT can potentially be used in the busy clinical setting to assess psychological distress in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

    Drug therapy for cancer is a high-risk, high-volume clinical intervention that requires interprofessional teams. Given the complexity of anticancer drug therapy and safety concerns, an interdisciplinary team developed a novel training program for oncology registered nurses and pharmacists to improve cancer drug safety.

    Participants completed preworkshop learning assessments and received access to web-based modules on six topics hazardous drug handling, drug extravasation, hypersensitivity reaction management, sepsis recognition, immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities, and oral oncolytic adherence. In a 7-hour workshop, participants applied module content in interactive exercises and high-fidelity simulations. Preworkshop and postworkshop questionnaires assessed changes in knowledge and confidence in each topic. Program satisfaction and changes to clinical practice or policies were assessed 3 months after the workshop.

    Two hundred ninety-two nurses and 82 pharmacists applied to participate, and 103 (35%) and 44 (54%) have participated, respectively.

Facebook Pagelike Widget

Who’s Online

Profile picture of Patrick Burnham
Profile picture of Patel Thrane
Profile picture of Khan Amstrup
Profile picture of Fallon Wentworth
Profile picture of Duran Santos
Profile picture of Zhao Kragelund
Profile picture of Skaaning Jonasson
Profile picture of Olsen Matthiesen
Profile picture of Rubin Barrett
Profile picture of Laursen Munksgaard