Deprecated: bp_before_xprofile_cover_image_settings_parse_args is deprecated since version 6.0.0! Use bp_before_members_cover_image_settings_parse_args instead. in /home/top4art.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5094
  • Hodge Campos posted an update 2 days, 7 hours ago

    Background External trigeminal nerve stimulation (ETNS) is an emergent, non-invasive neurostimulation therapy delivered bilaterally with adhesive skin electrodes. In previous studies, ETNS was associated to a decrease in seizure frequency in patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Objective To determine the long-term efficacy and tolerability of ETNS in patients with focal DRE. Moreover, to explore whether its efficacy depends on the epileptogenic zone (frontal or temporal), and its impact on mood, cognitive function, quality of life, and trigeminal nerve excitability. Methods Forty consecutive patients with frontal or temporal DRE, unsuitable for surgery, were randomized to ETNS or usual medical treatment. Participants were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months for efficacy, side effects, mood scales, neuropsychological tests and trigeminal nerve excitability. Results Subjects had a median of 15 seizures per month and had tried a median of 12.5 antiepileptic drugs. At 12 months, percentage of responders was 50% in ETNS group and 0% in control group. Seizure frequency in ETNS group decreased by -43.5% from baseline. Temporal epilepsy subgroup responded better than frontal epilepsy subgroup (55.56% vs. 45.45%, respectively). Median stimulation intensity was 6.2 mA. ETNS improved quality of life, but not anxiety or depression. Long-term ETNS affected neither neuropsychological function, nor trigeminal nerve excitability. No relevant adverse events were observed. Conclusions ETNS is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for focal DRE. Patients with temporal epilepsy showed a better response than those with frontal epilepsy. Future studies with larger populations may define its role compared to other neurostimulation techniques. Classification of evidence This study provides Class II evidence that ETNS reduces seizure frequency in patients with focal DRE.Aim To evaluate the adhesive bond integrity (shear bond strength-SBS) of composite resin bonded to carious dentin using chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), Er,CrYSGG laser (ECYL) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Material and methods Thirty carious and ten non-carious mandibular teeth were collected through non-traumatic extraction. All samples were embedded in polyvinyl cross-sections to the cemento-enamel junction. The preparation of caries-affected dentin was performed by grinding the specimens using silicon carbide discs. All specimens were randomly allocated in to four groups (n = 10). Group 1, non-affected dentin with no disinfection; Group 2, caries affected dentin treated with 2% CHX; Group 3, affected dentin disinfected with PDT [100 mg/L methylene blue solution (MBS) and Diode laser]; Group 4, affected dentin treated with ECYL. Self-etch adhesive was smeared on all specimens for 10 sec and photopolymerized for 10 sec. All specimens were placed in an incubator with humid environment for 24 hours at 37 °C fo non-carious dentin.Background Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is Gram-positive bacteria, a major human pathogen, which causes a wide variety of serious infections when it enters the bloodstream or internal tissues. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) utilizing a light-activated dye (photosensitizer) is a powerful method for in vitro and in vivo eradication of S. aureus and other pathogenic bacteria. However, the development of highly efficient, long-wavelength photosensitizers showing high phototoxicity to pathogens and low dark toxicity is still challenging. Cloperastine fendizoate purchase Aim To develop a highly efficient, long-wavelength photosensitizer for photodynamic inactivation of S. aureus. Method Synthesis of the new photosensitizer, hexa-iodinated quinono-cyanine dye IQCy and investigation of the dark and light-induced toxicity of this dye compared to known photosensitizers Chlorin e6 (Ce6) and HITC towards S. aureus. Results When exposed to 14.9 J/cm2 white LED light, 0.5 µM of IQCy, Ce6 and HITC inactivate, respectively, 99 %, 40 % and 30 % of S. aureus and at 0.05 µM and 27.9 J/cm2 – 71 %, 18 % and 9%, which is much better compared to Ce6 and HITC. IQCy exhibits no dark toxicity at least at 10 µM dye concentration. Conclusions IQCy demonstrates a more pronounced photodynamic inactivation of S. aureus as compared to Ce6 and HITC and can be employed for the eradication of these bacteria at lower concentration and reduced light dose.Photocytotoxic effect induced by 5,10,15,20-tetrakis[4-(3-N,N-dimethylaminopropoxy)phenyl]porphyrin (TAPP) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis[4-(3-N,N,N-trimethylaminepropoxy)phenyl]porphyrin (TAPP+4) was examined in Candida albicans to obtain information on the mechanism of photodynamic action and cell damage. For this purpose, the photokilling of the yeast was investigated under anoxic conditions and cell suspensions in D2O. Moreover, photoinactivation of C. albicans was evaluated in presence of reactive oxygen species scavengers, such as sodium azide and D-mannitol. The results indicated that singlet molecular oxygen was the main reactive species involved in cell damage. On the other hand, the binding and distribution of these porphyrins in the cells was observed by fluorescence microscopy. Morphological damage was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), indicating modifications in the cell envelopment. Furthermore, deformed cells were observed after photoinactivation of C. albicans by toluidine blue staining. In addition, modifications in the cell envelope due to the photodynamic activity was found by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Similar photodamage was observed with both porphyrin, which mainly produced alterations in the cell barriers that lead to the photoinactivation of C. albicans.Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a potential adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer with several advantages. Mechanistically, pancreatic cancer PDT can induce apoptosis and necrosis of pancreatic cancer cells and lead to vascular damage and enhance anti-tumor immune response in tumor tissues. However, limitations of current photosensitizers such as limited penetration depth, poor targeted therapy and inadequate reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation still exist. Recently, several novel photosensitizers have been reported to break through limits in pancreatic cancer PDT. Methods combined with biomedical engineering, materialogy and chemical engineering have been employed to overcome the difficulties and to realize targeted therapy. Preclinical and clinical trials also preliminarily confirmed the technical feasibility and safety of pancreatic cancer PDT. Therefore, PDT may be potential to be used as an effective adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer multimodality therapy. This review will give an overview about pancreatic cancer PDT from basic experimental studies, preclinical and clinical application to future direction of pancreatic cancer PDT.

Facebook Pagelike Widget

Who’s Online

Profile picture of Patrick Burnham
Profile picture of Patel Thrane
Profile picture of Khan Amstrup
Profile picture of Fallon Wentworth
Profile picture of Duran Santos
Profile picture of Zhao Kragelund
Profile picture of Skaaning Jonasson
Profile picture of Olsen Matthiesen
Profile picture of Rubin Barrett
Profile picture of Laursen Munksgaard
Profile picture of Stout Tyler