Deprecated: bp_before_xprofile_cover_image_settings_parse_args is deprecated since version 6.0.0! Use bp_before_members_cover_image_settings_parse_args instead. in /home/top4art.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5094
  • Womble Jonassen posted an update 4 days, 10 hours ago

    Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women. Its incidence is associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS), which are highly prevalent world widely and have been identified as poorer prognosis factors in breast cancer including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which has poorer response to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is one of the immune checkpoints ligands that facilitates tumor escape and progress. Obesity/MetS could cause systemic inflammation and immune disorders, however, whether and how obesity/MetS affect PD-L1 expression in breast cancer had not been clarified. In the present study, we examined the PD-L1 expression profile in breast cancer either in online database or cell lines. We found higher PD-L1 mRNA level but not DNA copy number in breast cancer than normal breast tissue, and higher PD-L1 expression in TNBC than other subtypes. Moreover, we found a positive relationship between PD-L1 expression in TNBC and metabolic complications in patients. Next, obesity/MetS related M1 macrophage was found to promote the expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer cells cocultured with polarized macrophages derived from either monocyte-like cell line THP-1 or Wistar rat models. IL6/JAK/STAT pathway was further identified to be involved in the process. In addition, we discovered that the PD-L1 expression promoted by obesity/MetS could be restored by telmisartan, one of the angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and could affect macrophage polarization, through its selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARG) activation and NFKB p65 inhibition and therefore downregulates IL6 secretion from M1 macrophage.

    The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the literature on Achilles tendon (AT) injuries in professional athletes to determine their rate of return to play (RTP), performance, and career outcome after AT rupture.

    A literature search of MEDLINE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Included studies reported outcomes related to RTP (time and rate), durability and player participation, and player performance following AT rupture in professional athletes of the National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), Major League Baseball (MLB), and professional soccer leagues.

    Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria for analysis. Athletes were able to return to professional sport participation 76% of the time, with mean time to RTP of 11 months following AT injury. Athletes experienced a decline in player efficiency ratings, power ratings, and sport- and position-specific statistics in the NFL, NBA, and professional soccer leagues compared to noninjured controls. RTP rate was significantly lower following AT rupture in comparison to athletes sustaining other common orthopaedic injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament injuries, meniscal tears, and ankle fractures in both NFL and NBA athletes.

    AT rupture prohibits nearly 25% of professional athletes from returning to their respective sport. Of those able to return to compete at a professional level, the mean time to RTP is 11 months-nearly double the estimated 6-month recovery for RTP in the general population. Furthermore, player performance and durability were curtailed following AT rupture. This review of the literature should be used to set evidence-based goals and establish realistic expectations for RTP for elite athletes following AT injuries.

    Level III, systematic review.

    Level III, systematic review.Introduction The most common cause of acute renal colic is a ureteral obstruction caused by ureterolithiasis. Urgent intervention is often necessary due to intractable pain. Early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) as an alternative treatment option to ureteral stenting becomes forgotten in times of rising ureterorenoscopy. However, definitive guidelines are lacking, in which urgent treatment should be preferred in the absence of signs of infection. Therefore, we assessed efficacy and safety of early SWL (eSWL) to secondary SWL (sSWL) after urgent ureteral stenting. Patients and Methods One hundred four patients treated between January 2015 and November 2017 for obstructive ureterolithiasis were matched regarding stone size, stone localization, and assigned to group eSWL (n = 52) or group sSWL (n = 52). The eSWL group received shock waves (without prior ureteral stenting) and sSWL group ureteral stenting within 48 hours from diagnosis. Thereafter, patients in group sSWL were treated with shock waves fbe considered as a treatment option in patients without absolute indications for immediate ureteral drainage. Clinical trial registration number 2019-00155.Introduction Airway mucus gel layer serves as a key delivery barrier that limits the performance of inhaled drug delivery nanoparticles. Conventional nanoparticles are readily trapped by the airway mucus and rapidly cleared from the lung via mucus clearance mechanisms. These nanoparticles cannot distribute throughout the lung airways, long-reside in the lung and/or reach the airway epithelium. To address this challenge, strategies to enhance particle penetration through the airway mucus have been developed and proof-of-concept has been established using mucus model systems.. Areas covered In this review, we first overview the biochemical and biophysical characteristics that render the airway mucus a challenging delivery barrier. PF-04957325 price We then introduce strategies to improve particle penetration through the airway mucus. Specifically, we walk through two classes of approaches, including modification of physicochemical properties of nanoparticles and modulation of barrier properties of airway mucus. Expert opinion State-of-the-art strategies to overcome the airway mucus barrier have been introduced and experimentally validated. However, data should be interpreted in the comprehensive context of therapeutic delivery from the site of administration to the final destination to determine clinically-relevant approaches. Further, safety should be carefully monitored, particularly when it comes to mucus-altering strategies that may perturb physiological functions of airway mucus.

Facebook Pagelike Widget

Who’s Online

Profile picture of Buus Bateman
Profile picture of Justesen Hull
Profile picture of Worm Stafford
Profile picture of Finch Hanley
Profile picture of Tarp Salas