itions are mandatory to obtain reproducible data.Cancer treatments can be highly toxic and frequently only a subset of the patient population will benefit from a given treatment. Tumour genetic makeup plays an important role in cancer drug sensitivity. We suspect that gene expression markers could be used as a decision aid for treatment selection or dosage tuning. Using in vitro cancer cell line dose-response and gene expression data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) project, we build a dose-varying regression model. Unlike existing approaches, this allows us to estimate dosage-dependent associations with gene expression. We include the transcriptomic profiles as dose-invariant covariates into the regression model and assume that their effect varies smoothly over the dosage levels. A two-stage variable selection algorithm (variable screening followed by penalized regression) is used to identify genetic factors that are associated with drug response over the varying dosages. We evaluate the effectiveness of our method using simulation studies focusing on the choice of tuning parameters and cross-validation for predictive accuracy assessment. We further apply the model to data from five BRAF targeted compounds applied to different cancer cell lines under different dosage levels. We highlight the dosage-dependent dynamics of the associations between the selected genes and drug response, and we perform pathway enrichment analysis to show that the selected genes play an important role in pathways related to tumorigenesis and DNA damage response.The selection pressures that have shaped the evolution of complex traits in humans remain largely unknown, and in some contexts highly contentious, perhaps above all where they concern mean trait differences among groups. To date, the discussion has focused on whether such group differences have any genetic basis, and if so, whether they are without fitness consequences and arose via random genetic drift, or whether they were driven by selection for different trait optima in different environments. Here, we highlight a plausible alternative that many complex traits evolve under stabilizing selection in the face of shifting environmental effects. Under this scenario, there will be rapid evolution at the loci that contribute to trait variation, even when the trait optimum remains the same. These considerations underscore the strong assumptions about environmental effects that are required in ascribing trait differences among groups to genetic differences.Cases of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer represent approximately 15% to 20% of all breast cancers. Historically, this subtype of breast cancer was associated with an increased risk for the development of systemic and brain metastases and poor overall survival. The introduction of trastuzumab dramatically changed the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive disease, with many demonstrating outcomes similar to those of patients with luminal tumors. Currently, the first-line standard of care for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is dual HER2 antibody therapy with pertuzumab/trastuzumab plus a taxane. After progression, the standard of care is trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Although the treatment choices for patients whose disease has progressed on these agents are more limited, promising new drugs have emerged as effective options, including tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan, which were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Finding the best treatment sequencing for each patient, developing reliable predictive biomarkers, and understanding the mechanisms of resistance to these drugs are necessary to maximize patient outcomes and quality of life. Tinengotinib order In this review, we analyze the management strategies for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, address specific situations, such as the treatment of patients with brain metastases, and discuss future directions in the treatment of this subtype.Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. The majority of tumors present at an advanced stage, and relapse often occurs after surgery conducted with curative intent. In both of these cases, standard treatment is a combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine. The use of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in second-line treatment improves survival, but outcomes remain dismal. Studies have shown that cholangiocarcinoma possesses a wide spectrum of genetic aberrations. Clinical trials evaluating targeted therapies in patients with FGFR2 fusions, IDH1 mutations, and BRAF mutations have yielded very promising results, and the agents were generally well tolerated. Several FGFR2 fusion-targeted agents have achieved response rates between 20.7% and 35.5%, with disease stability rates ranging between 76% and 82%. Agents targeting FGFR2 fusions also have produced median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 5.7 to 6.9 months and median overall survival (OS) ranging from 12.5 to 21.1 months. Ivosidenib in patients with an IDH1/2 mutation has produced a response rate of 2% and a disease stability rate of 51%, with median PFS of 2.7 months and median OS of 10.8 months. In patients with a BRAF mutation, a combination of dabrafenib and trametinib led to an overall response rate of 51% and disease stability in another 40% of patients. Median PFS and OS were 9 and 14 months, respectively. Patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.BACKGROUND Apixaban is one of the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) being used to manage venous thrombosis. Skin toxicities are recognized adverse effects of the new DOACs, but are rare and usually associated with vasculitis. This report is of a 78-year-old man admitted to the hospital with pulmonary thromboembolism, who developed severe and extensive skin necrosis of both forearms 7 days after treatment with apixaban. CASE REPORT A 78-year-old man was admitted for pulmonary embolism and congestive heart failure exacerbation. He was started on therapeutic enoxaparin and diuresis. Later on, enoxaparin was substituted with apixaban. Seven days after starting apixaban, he suddenly developed skin changes that developed into skin necrosis on both forearms and the abdominal wall. A skin biopsy was not performed due to the high risk of bleeding. Skin necrosis was diagnosed based on clinical findings. A review of clinical data and the patient’s medication profile did not reveal any other possible etiology or culprit medication.