001, n = 6). When the pipette solution contained ADPR (300 μM) and the TRPM2 antagonists flufenamic acid (FFA) (100 μM), N-(p-amylcinnamoyl) anthranilic acid (ACA) (50 μM) and 8-bromo-cADP-Ribose (8-Br-cADPR) (50 μM), the membrane potential shifted in a hyperpolarizing direction. ADPR did not significantly change the resting membrane potential and action potential firing rate of stellate cells from TRPM2-/- mice. In conclusion, the results obtained using these molecular, immunohistochemical and electrophysiological approaches reveal the expression of functional TRPM2 channels in stellate neurons of the mouse VCN. TRPM2 might exert a significant modulatory effect on setting the level of resting excitability.Vitellogenin (Vg) is important for insect egg maturation and embryo development. In the present study, we characterized the molecular structure and expression profile of Vg gene, and analyzed its reproductive functions in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), a destructive pest of cruciferous crops, using CRISPR/Cas9 system. The P. xylostella Vg (PxVg) included all conserved domains and motifs that were commonly found in most insect Vgs except for the polyserine tract. PxVg gene was highly expressed in female pupae and adults. PxVg protein was detected in eggs and female adults. PxVg was mainly expressed in the fat body and its protein was detected in most tissues, except in the midgut. CRISPR/Cas9-induced PxVg knockout successfully constructed a homozygous mutant strain with a 5-base pair nucleotide deletion. No PxVg protein was found in the mutant individuals and in their ovaries. There were no significant differences between wild (WT) and mutant (Mut-5) types of P. xylostella in terms of ovariole length and the number of fully developed oocytes in newly emerged females. No significant difference was observed in the number of eggs laid within two days, but there was a lower egg hatchability (84% for WT vs. 47% for Mut-5). This is the first study presenting the functions of Vg in ovary development, egg maturation, oviposition and embryonic development of P. xylostella. Our results suggest that the reproductive functions of Vg may be species-specific in insects. It is possible that Vg may not be the major egg yolk protein precursor in P. xylostella. Other “functional Vgs” closely involved in the yolk formation and oogenesis would need to be further explored in P. xylostella.Background Food allergy is common in children with prevalence up to 10%. We assessed the clinico-laboratory characteristics and frequency of food sensitization to the commonly consumed food among upper Egyptian preschool children with recurrent wheezy chest. Methods This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 100 preschool children with recurrent wheezy chest recruited from Emergency, Allergy, and Pulmonology units, Assiut University Children’s Hospital, Egypt. All enrolled patients were subjected to history taking, through examination, chest X-ray, skin prick testing (SPT), and lab investigations. Results Family history of allergy was found in 66 patients, while history of other allergies was reported in 47 patients. History of food allergy was positive in 47% of the studied patients, and 28 patients had positive reaction by SPT. Sensitization to fish, milk, egg, and wheat was found in 15, 8, 5, and 4 patients, respectively. Eighteen out of the 28 patients who were sensitized by SPT gave positive history of food allergy, while ten patients had no suggestive history; also, history suggestive of food allergy was negative in 35.7% of sensitized patients versus 61.1% of non-sensitized patients. Conclusions Food sensitization is common in preschool Egyptian children with recurrent wheezing. Impact Food sensitization is common in children with prevalence up to 10%, and in atopic children up to 30%.Sensitization to fish was the most common type of sensitization observed among preschool children with recurrent wheezing, followed by milk, eggs, and wheat, respectively.SPT aided by history is a good screening tool to determine whether patients need to avoid some foods that can cause allergy in order to help in controlling their symptoms.In the midst of the current opioid epidemic, we have encountered more parents who are concerned about the use of opioids in the perioperative setting. Some parents have completely refused the use of opioids on behalf of their children. How should we approach this treatment refusal? This article describes ethical theory related to the refusal of treatment by parents on behalf of their children, and when it is justified to override parental decisions. ATPase inhibitor We propose a decision-making framework that focuses on improving communication and considering alternatives. Assessment of harm to the child from avoiding opioids, as well as potential harms from overriding parental autonomy must be undertaken prior to considering overriding parents.The Turing reaction-diffusion model and the French Flag Model are widely accepted in the field of development as the best models for explaining embryogenesis. Virtually all current attempts to understand cell differentiation in embryos begin and end with the assumption that some combination of these two models works. The result may become a bias in embryogenesis in assuming the problem has been solved by these two-chemical substance-based models. Neither model is applied consistently. We review the differences between the French Flag, Turing reaction-diffusion model, and a mechanochemical model called the differentiation wave/cell state splitter model. The cytoskeletal cell state splitter and the embryonic differentiation waves was first proposed in 1987 as a combined physics and chemistry model for cell differentiation in embryos, based on empirical observations on urodele amphibian embryos. We hope that the development of theory can be advanced and observations relevant to distinguishing the embryonic differentiation wave model from the French Flag model and reaction-diffusion equations will be taken up by experimentalists. Experimentalists rely on mathematical biologists for theory, and therefore depend on them for what parameters they choose to measure and ignore. Therefore, mathematical biologists need to fully understand the distinctions between these three models.