Moreover, it is easy to use for health providers working with disabled children.Diffuse peritonitis represents a life-threatening complication of acute appendicitis (AA). Whether laparoscopy is a safe procedure and presents similar results compared with laparotomy in case of complicated AA is still a matter of debate. The objective of this study is to compare laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) for the management of diffuse peritonitis caused by AA. This is a prospective multicenter cohort study, including 223 patients with diffuse peritonitis from perforated AA, enrolled in the Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) study from February to May 2018. Two groups were created LA = 78 patients, mean age 42.51 ± 22.14 years and OA = 145 patients, mean age 38.44 ± 20.95 years. LA was employed in 34.98% of cases. There was no statically significant difference between LA and OA groups in terms of intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative peritonitis, rate of reoperation, and mortality. The wound infection rate was higher in the OA group (OR 21.63; 95% CI 3.46-895.47; P = 0.00). The mean postoperative hospital stay in the LA group was shorter than in the OA group (6.40 ± 4.29 days versus 7.8 ± 5.30 days; P = 0.032). Although LA was only used in one-third of cases, it is a safe procedure and should be considered in the management of patients with diffuse peritonitis caused by AA, respecting its indications.BACKGROUND The usefulness of routine electrocardiograms (ECGs) in cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) and diabetes care is doubted. OBJECTIVES To assess the performance of general practitioners (GPs) in embedding ECGs in CVRM and diabetes care. METHODS We collected 852 ECGs recorded by 20 GPs (12 practices) in the context of CVRM and diabetes care. Of all abnormal (n = 265) and a sample of the normal (n = 35) ECGs, data on the indications, interpretations and management actions were extracted from the corresponding medical records. An expert panel consisting of one cardiologist and one expert GP reviewed these 300 ECG cases. RESULTS GPs found new abnormalities in 13.0% of all 852 ECGs (12.0% in routinely recorded ECGs versus 24.3% in ECGs performed for a specific indication). learn more Management actions followed more often after ECGs performed for specific indications (17.6%) than after routine ECGs (6.0%). The expert panel agreed with the GPs’ interpretations in 67% of the 300 assessed cases. Most often misinterpreted relevant ECG abnormalities were previous myocardial infarction, R‑wave abnormalities and typical/atypical ST-segment and T‑wave (ST-T) abnormalities. Agreement on patient management between GP and expert panel was 74%. Disagreement in most cases concerned additional diagnostic testing. CONCLUSIONS In the context of programmatic CVRM and diabetes care by GPs, the yield of newly found ECG abnormalities is modest. It is higher for ECGs recorded for a specific reason. Educating GPs seems necessary in this field since they perform less well in interpreting and managing CVRM ECGs than in ECGs performed in symptomatic patients.This study assesses the differences in postoperative nutritional status between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). We searched the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database. Twenty-nine articles were included, with a total of 5437 obese patients. After bariatric surgery, the LSG group had less anemia and iron deficiency anemia than the LRYGB group. The serum iron, ferritin deficiency, and vitamin B12 rates after LSG were lower than patients receiving LRYGB. And PTH and serum phosphorus concentration of patients after LSG were both lower than those after LRYGB. The postoperative results of LSG were better than that of LRYGB. Therefore, we recommend LSG for a better postoperative nutrition, but only for reference.Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been instituted in various subspecialties of surgery. This study aims to provide evidence that ERAS protocols are safe and feasible in revisional bariatric surgery. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent conversion from laparoscopic gastric band (LAGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from January 2016 to February 2018 at a single independent academic medical center. We calculated the average LOS for these patients as well as the 30-day readmission and 30-day reoperation rates. Median length of stay (LOS) was 1 day (range 1-5) with 92.9% of all patients leaving by postoperative day 3. No patients were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days and none required reoperation.INTRODUCTION The effect of preoperative weight loss via very low caloric diet (VLCD) on long-term weight loss post-bariatric surgery (BS) is conflicting. We analysed its impact on weight loss and other outcomes post-BS. METHODS Patients (n = 306) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass from 2008 to 2018 were studied. VLCD was prescribed for 14 days preoperatively. Patients were followed up for 5 years. Postoperative weight loss was compared in patients with preoperative weight gain or weight loss less then  5% (WL  less then  5%), and weight loss ≥ 5% (WL ≥ 5%). Preoperative WL compared weight before and after VLCD; postoperative WL compared post-VLCD weight and follow-up weight. Total weight loss (TWL) encompassed pre- and postoperative WL. RESULTS WL was less then  5% in 87.3% and ≥ 5% in 12.7%. There was no significant difference in complication rate, duration of surgery or length of stay, regardless of surgical type. Patients with WL  less then  5% lost more weight postoperatively compared with WL ≥ 5% for up to 60 months (%postoperative WL at 1 month WL  less then  5% = 13.7%, WL ≥ 5% = 10%, p =  less then 0.001; 60 months WL  less then  5% = 30.6%, WL ≥ 5% = 23.9%, p = 0.041). However, when TWL and percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) were measured, there was no difference beyond 6 months. A predictive multivariable model for 1-year %EBMIL was formed. Significant variables included pre-VLCD BMI and preoperative WL, and the relationship between the two. CONCLUSION Preoperative WL via VLCD was associated with reduced postoperative WL after BS, with no significant effect on complications, long-term TWL or %EBMIL. This challenges the notion that preoperative WL via VLCD should be mandated for better postoperative outcomes.