-
Sims Steenberg posted an update 17 days ago
blished limit of 100 mGy for a high risk of damage during the first trimester. The largest dose encountered was 75 mGy (0.125% of prescription dose). The majority of treatments with measurement positions less than 30 cm fell into the range of uncertain risk (50 – 100 mGy). All treatments with measurement positions beyond 30 cm fell into the low risk category ( less then 50 mGy). For the cases in this study, tomotherapy resulted in foetal doses that are at least on par with, if not significantly lower than, similar 3D conformal or intensity-modulated treatments delivered with other devices. Recommendations were also provided for estimating foetal doses from tomotherapy plans.The purpose of this case study is to describe an external beam radiation therapy planning technique for carcinoma of the left breast. A female patient on protocol NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 presented with unusual anatomy and large habitus. Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) IMRT was used in conjunction a DIBH-3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) tangential boost plan to meet the dose criteria for protocol compliance. Traditionally 3DCRT planning using a DIBH technique would be used for both billing authorization and as DIBH-IMRT involves a longer treatment time and more difficulty in terms of patient compliance; however, the patient tolerated the treatment very well. The subsequent treatment plan met all criteria per protocol with the exception of the ipsilateral lung, which passed with acceptable variation.We aimed to compare the reliability of the surgery-first approach and the traditional orthodontic-first approach for the correction of facial asymmetry based on the new classification of facial asymmetry. Patients with facial asymmetry who underwent orthognathic surgery between January 2016 and January 2019 were included. Cephalometric changes and relapse ratios were analyzed 12 months before and after surgery. Patients were divided into horizontal and vertical asymmetry groups based on the asymmetry vector, and subgroup analysis was conducted. The surgery-first approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment and the orthodontic-first approach showed a similar degree of asymmetry correction and skeletal stability. selleck chemicals The relapse ratios of the maxilla height in the surgery-first and orthodontic-first groups were 0.25 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25, respectively (p = 0.63), the relapse ratios of the maxilla width were 0.31 ± 0.32 and 0.21 ± 0.2, respectively (p = 0.14), the mandibular height relapse ratios were 0.34 ± 0.58 and 0.29 ± 0.36, respectively (p = 0.69), and the mandibular width relapse ratios were 0.12 ± 0.22 and 0.26 ± 0.31, respectively (p = 0.058). The treatment period of the surgery-first group (18.5 ± 5.3 months) was significantly shorter than that of the orthodontic-first group (22.9 ± 7.5 months, p = 0.024). Among the surgery-first group, patients with vertical asymmetry (15.0 ± 3.2 months) had a shorter treatment than those with horizontal asymmetry (21.6 ± 6.8 months, p = 0.006). Although contesting traditional standards is always challenging, the surgery-first orthognathic approach may lead to a new era in traditional orthognathic approaches. This new classification of facial asymmetry could be useful and practical when treating patients with facial asymmetry regardless of the etiology.
To analyse whether (1) passive or active pain coping strategies and (2) presence of neuropathic pain component influences the change of Achilles tendinopathy (AT) symptoms over a course of 24 weeks in conservatively-treated patients.
Prospective cohort study.
Patients with clinically-diagnosed chronic midportion AT were conservatively treated. At baseline, the Pain Coping Inventory (PCI) was used to determine scores of coping, which consisted of two domains, active and passive (score ranging from 0 to 1; the higher, the more active or passive). Presence of neuropathic pain (PainDETECT questionnaire, -1 to 38 points) was categorized as (a) unlikely (≤12 points), (b) unclear (13-18 points) and (c) likely (≥19 points). The symptom severity was determined with the validated Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire (0-100) at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. We analysed the correlation between (1) PCI and (2) PainDETECT baseline scores with change in VISA-A score using an adjusted Generalized Estimating Equations model.
Of 80 included patients, 76 (95%) completed the 24-weeks follow-up. The mean VISA-A score (standard deviation) increased from 43 (16) points at baseline to 63 (23) points at 24 weeks. Patients had a mean (standard deviation) active coping score of 0.53 (0.13) and a passive score of 0.43 (0.10). Twelve patients (15%) had a likely neuropathic pain component. Active and passive coping mechanisms and presence of neuropathic pain did not influence the change in AT symptoms (p=0.459, p=0.478 and p=0.420, respectively).
Contrary to widespread belief, coping strategy and presence of neuropathic pain are not associated with a worse clinical outcome in this homogeneous group of patients with clinically diagnosed AT.
Contrary to widespread belief, coping strategy and presence of neuropathic pain are not associated with a worse clinical outcome in this homogeneous group of patients with clinically diagnosed AT.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with high cardiovascular risk. Preclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and subclinical arterial stiffness have been documented in patients with T2DM. The aims of this study were to investigate whether there were any differences in LV function and ascending aorta elasticity between T2DM patients with controlled [defined as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <6.5%] and uncontrolled (HbA1c ≥6.5%) blood glucose.
We studied 86 T2DM patients 42 T2DM patients with controlled blood glucose (controlled T2DM group) and 44 T2DM patients with uncontrolled blood glucose (uncontrolled T2DM group), and 40 healthy subjects as control. They all underwent transthoracic echocardiography examination, LV systolic function was evaluated by global longitudinal strain (GLS) and LV diastolic function was defined as the ratio of the early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E) to average mitral annular velocity (e¯). Ascending aorta inner diameters and brachial blood pressure were measured to calculate ascending aorta elastic parameters compliance (C), distensibility (D), strain (S), stiffness index (SI), Peterson’s elastic modulus (EM).