349±0.077 vs 0.336±0.058), which would indicate a slight reduction of the cardiac motion artifact, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.24). In the qualitative evaluation, the readers did not observe a significant difference for b50 (reader 1 p = 0.61; reader 2 p = 0.18). For b800, reader 1 observed a significant difference of small e…[Read more]