Concha bullosa is characterized by pneumotization of the middle turbinate and is a common variation of sinonasal anatomy and is often asymptomatic. The presence of a fungus ball in concha bullosa and the associated clinic symptoms are very rare. Concha bullosa fungus balls are a rare differential diagnosis in a patient presenting to the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic with headache.In this article, the authors aimed to present an isolated fungus ball case in concha bullosa as a rare cause of headache differential diagnosis.Meningioma is the most common intracranial benign tumor in adults. Hyperostosis accompanies about 4.5% of meningiomas. The authors report a rare case of hyperostotic meningioma that may have been misdiagnosed as giant osteoma.A 42-year male visited our clinic due to an egg-sized, hard mass on his left forehead. The mass suspected to be giant osteoma was about 4.2 × 4.0 cm sized, hard, non-movable, and non-tender. But based on radiologic findings, the mass was diagnosed as meningioma with extensive hyperostosis.Without neurologic symptoms, the diagnosis of meningioma associated with hyperostosis can be challenging and be misdiagnosed as fibrous dysplasia and osteoma by simple examination without enhanced CT and MRI.Therefore, although osseous lesions are strongly suspected to be osteomas, surgeons should consider other diagnoses, and if necessary, use contrast enhanced CT or MRI to differentiate these bony lesions.Petrous apex cephalocel, also called arachnoid cyst or meningocele, is a rare cephalocele caused by protrusion of the posterolateral wall of the Meckel cave to the petrous apex. Increased intracranial pressure is thought to play a role in etiopathogenesis and is generally asymptomatic. Radiologically, they are expansile lesions with the same density or intensity as cerebrospinal fluid and may mimic cystic masses. The diagnosis is made by showing the continuity with Meckel cave on magnetic resonance imaging. No intervention is required in asymptomatic patients; surgical treatment is applied in symptomatics.Hemangiomas are benign vascular lesions characterized by endothelial vascular proliferation and may demonstrate aggressive clinical features. Intraosseous hemangiomas are uncommon and the maxillary location rare, with few cases described in the literature. The treatment of these lesions varies, however they have a better prognosis when a surgical treatment through resection is performed. The aim of this study is to report a case of right maxillary cavernous intraosseous hemangioma treated by surgical resection with previous embolization. The diagnosis was made through incisional biopsy and immunohistochemical examination. An aggressive lesion profile was observed through the Ki67 marker. During surgery, a temporary ipsilateral external carotid artery ligation was performed to minimize possible bleeding. Weber-Fergson surgical access was performed and total surgical resection through hemi-maxillectomy. The patient is stable after 30 months of follow-up without relapses. In suspected cases of intraosseous hemangiomas, accurate diagnosis and total surgical resection of the lesion is essential. The use of therapeutic mammoths that minimize sagging during and after the procedure such as embolization and arteriography should always be performed.INTRODUCTION A qualitative assessment of discharge resource needs is important for developing evidence-based care improvements in neurocritically ill patients. METHODS We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academic hospital and included all patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU) during an 18-month period. Telephone assessments were made at 3 to 6 months after admission. Patients or caregivers were asked whether they had adequate resources upon discharge and whether they had any unanswered questions. The content of responses was reviewed by a neurointensivist and a neurocritical care nurse practitioner. A structured codebook was developed, organized into themes, and applied to the responses. RESULTS Sixty-one patients or caregivers responded regarding access to resources at discharge with 114 individual codable responses. Responses centered around 5 themes with 23 unique codes satisfied, needs improvement, dissatisfied, poor post-ICU care, and poor health. The most frequently coded responses were that caregivers believed their loved one had experienced an unclear discharge (n = 11) or premature discharge (n = 12). Two hundred four patients or caregivers responded regarding unanswered questions or additional comments at follow-up, with 516 codable responses. These centered around 6 themes with 26 unique codes positive experience, negative experience, neutral experience, medical questions, ongoing medical care or concern, or remembrance of time spent in the ICU. Selleck garsorasib The most frequent response was that caregivers or patients stated that they received good care (n = 115). Multiple concerns were brought up, including lack of follow-up after hospitalization (n = 15) and dissatisfaction with post-ICU care (n = 15). CONCLUSIONS Obtaining qualitative responses after discharge provided insight into the transition from critical care. This could form the basis for an intervention to provide a smoother transition from the ICU to the outpatient setting.STUDY DESIGN A prospective analysis. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the hyper-selective posterior fusion [upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) as the vertebra 1 level below the upper end vertebra (UEV), lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) as the lower end vertebra (LEV)] was applicable in posterior fusion of Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and what could be the indication of hyper-selective fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The improper UIV selection in selective fusion could lead to progressive thoracic compensatory curve, shoulder imbalance, and even coronal imbalance. However, few studies analyzed the clinical outcome of hyper-selective fusion. METHODS A prospective analysis of 80 patients with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent selective fusion was performed. According to the relationship between UEV and UIV, the patients were divided into UEV group (UIV= UEV) and UEV-1 group (UIV= UEV-1). Radiographic parameters and the incidence of post-operative proximal decompensation were compared. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were used to evaluate clinical outcomes between two groups.